{"id":14625,"date":"2026-11-04T18:30:11","date_gmt":"2026-11-04T08:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/?p=14625"},"modified":"2026-11-05T10:48:02","modified_gmt":"2026-11-05T00:48:02","slug":"better-explained-screening-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Fewer, Better-Explained Screening Results May Be More Valuable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span>Screening technology is often compared by the breadth of its databases and the number of potential matches it can uncover. Coverage matters: an organisation cannot assess a risk it never identifies. But sheer volume does not tell us whether a result is useful to the person who must review it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>For a business with a limited compliance team, fifty loosely related results can create more work than five well-supported findings. This is not an argument for hiding evidence. It is an argument for distinguishing <strong>discovery, relevance and the decision that follows<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>Coverage and usefulness answer different questions<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>A comprehensive search asks whether relevant information might exist. A good review process asks which information actually relates to the subject being screened, what it means and what needs to happen next.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>These are connected tasks, but they are not interchangeable. A fuzzy match can be valuable precisely because it catches spelling variations. The same matching technique can also return unrelated people with similar names. Suppressing results too aggressively could miss genuine concerns; presenting everything without context could overwhelm the reviewer.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The challenge is to preserve appropriate coverage while organising the output in a way that supports a defensible decision.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>Decision AI is about prioritisation with evidence<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>This is one application where a bounded Decision AI approach could be more helpful than simply adding a longer written summary.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Imagine that screening results are presented with transparent indicators showing which identifiers align, which contradict the potential match and which are unknown. A future decision-support layer might recommend that one result needs additional identity information, while another merits specialist review because several material identifiers align.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The important word is <em>recommend<\/em>. The system should not quietly discard sources, present a risk score as a legal conclusion or treat incomplete data as proof that there is no problem. It should show the evidence behind the suggested priority and allow a reviewer to challenge it.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>Not every risk indicator deserves the same response<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>A sanctions-list hit, a PEP profile and an adverse media article represent different forms of information. They carry different implications and may trigger different requirements under a business&#8217;s applicable policies and law.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Even within adverse media, context changes the interpretation. A historic allegation with a documented resolution is not the same as current credible reporting about an ongoing investigation. A person quoted as a witness should not automatically be treated as the subject of the allegation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>A useful decision-support workflow would preserve those differences rather than collapse everything into a single undifferentiated notion of risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>A better metric than matches returned<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>For organisations assessing screening workflows, it is worth asking a different set of questions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>How many results required manual identity verification? How often did reviewers need additional information? Were escalations supported by clear evidence? Could someone else understand the reason for a decision six months later?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>These measures are closer to the operational value of screening than raw result counts. They also reveal problems that search-speed benchmarks can miss: unclear output, duplicated work and inconsistent recordkeeping.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The objective is not simply fewer results. It is <strong>fewer unhelpful detours between screening and an accountable decision<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>What must not be optimised away<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>Any effort to rank, cluster or summarise screening findings needs safeguards. A model may be more confident than the underlying data justifies. A duplicated article may still contain a new factual development. Language differences can cause a significant detail to be overlooked.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Source access, reviewability, and the ability to reopen a case are therefore essential. A transparent system should make clear when it has insufficient information to assess a match.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>For SMEs, these safeguards are not optional extras reserved for large institutions. They help staff make decisions they can explain and defend.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>From more information to better attention<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>The next meaningful improvement in screening may not be another increase in the number of results displayed. It may be making it easier to see which results require attention, why they matter and what evidence still needs to be gathered.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>That is where Decision AI offers an interesting direction for NameScan&#8217;s market: <strong>helping businesses focus attention without confusing a technology recommendation with a compliance decision<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>Further reading<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>Explore <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/namescan.io\/pep\"><u>NameScan PEP screening<\/u><\/a><em><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/em><span>and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/namescan.io\/adversemedia\"><u>adverse media checks<\/u><\/a><span>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Screening technology is often compared by the breadth of its databases and the number of potential matches it can uncover. Coverage matters: an organisation cannot assess a risk it never identifies. But sheer volume does not tell us whether a result is useful to the person who must review it. For a business with a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":14627,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[85],"tags":[256,155],"class_list":["post-14625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog-post","tag-decision-ai","tag-screening"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Why Screening Result Quality Matters | NameScan<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"More screening matches do not always mean better decisions. Explore evidence, relevance, review quality and the possible role of Decision AI.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why Screening Result Quality Matters | NameScan\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"More screening matches do not always mean better decisions. Explore evidence, relevance, review quality and the possible role of Decision AI.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"NameScan Insight\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/namescan.io\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-04T08:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-05T00:48:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Screening-Results.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1314\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Zeeshan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@namescan_io\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@namescan_io\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Zeeshan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Zeeshan\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4b44ef0d98d04a56de3233bc1568d7a3\"},\"headline\":\"Why Fewer, Better-Explained Screening Results May Be More Valuable\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-04T08:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-05T00:48:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":710,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/Screening-Results.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Decision AI\",\"screening\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Blog Post\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/\",\"name\":\"Why Screening Result Quality Matters | NameScan\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/Screening-Results.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-04T08:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-05T00:48:02+00:00\",\"description\":\"More screening matches do not always mean better decisions. Explore evidence, relevance, review quality and the possible role of Decision AI.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/Screening-Results.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/Screening-Results.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1314},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/better-explained-screening-results\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why Fewer, Better-Explained Screening Results May Be More Valuable\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/\",\"name\":\"NameScan\",\"description\":\"AML Risk Management and Compliance\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"NameScan\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/13.239.146.144\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/namescan-banner.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/13.239.146.144\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/namescan-banner.png\",\"width\":300,\"height\":100,\"caption\":\"NameScan\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/namescan.io\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/namescan_io\",\"https:\\\/\\\/au.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/namescan.io\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCDMcXDG7Z965embyyEkWFLA\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/namescan.io\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4b44ef0d98d04a56de3233bc1568d7a3\",\"name\":\"Zeeshan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5060e430addd1087c0299e5ea76cd12ea794a85047ffecd5cfbbf24f4c1fbb2f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5060e430addd1087c0299e5ea76cd12ea794a85047ffecd5cfbbf24f4c1fbb2f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5060e430addd1087c0299e5ea76cd12ea794a85047ffecd5cfbbf24f4c1fbb2f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Zeeshan\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why Screening Result Quality Matters | NameScan","description":"More screening matches do not always mean better decisions. Explore evidence, relevance, review quality and the possible role of Decision AI.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why Screening Result Quality Matters | NameScan","og_description":"More screening matches do not always mean better decisions. Explore evidence, relevance, review quality and the possible role of Decision AI.","og_url":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/","og_site_name":"NameScan Insight","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/namescan.io\/","article_published_time":"2026-11-04T08:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-11-05T00:48:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1314,"url":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Screening-Results.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Zeeshan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@namescan_io","twitter_site":"@namescan_io","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Zeeshan","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/"},"author":{"name":"Zeeshan","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4b44ef0d98d04a56de3233bc1568d7a3"},"headline":"Why Fewer, Better-Explained Screening Results May Be More Valuable","datePublished":"2026-11-04T08:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-05T00:48:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/"},"wordCount":710,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Screening-Results.jpg","keywords":["Decision AI","screening"],"articleSection":["Blog Post"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/","url":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/","name":"Why Screening Result Quality Matters | NameScan","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Screening-Results.jpg","datePublished":"2026-11-04T08:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-05T00:48:02+00:00","description":"More screening matches do not always mean better decisions. Explore evidence, relevance, review quality and the possible role of Decision AI.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Screening-Results.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Screening-Results.jpg","width":1920,"height":1314},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/better-explained-screening-results\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why Fewer, Better-Explained Screening Results May Be More Valuable"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/","name":"NameScan","description":"AML Risk Management and Compliance","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#organization","name":"NameScan","url":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/13.239.146.144\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/namescan-banner.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/13.239.146.144\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/namescan-banner.png","width":300,"height":100,"caption":"NameScan"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/namescan.io\/","https:\/\/x.com\/namescan_io","https:\/\/au.linkedin.com\/company\/namescan.io","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCDMcXDG7Z965embyyEkWFLA"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4b44ef0d98d04a56de3233bc1568d7a3","name":"Zeeshan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5060e430addd1087c0299e5ea76cd12ea794a85047ffecd5cfbbf24f4c1fbb2f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5060e430addd1087c0299e5ea76cd12ea794a85047ffecd5cfbbf24f4c1fbb2f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5060e430addd1087c0299e5ea76cd12ea794a85047ffecd5cfbbf24f4c1fbb2f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Zeeshan"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14625"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14625\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14626,"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14625\/revisions\/14626"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14627"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/namescan.io\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}